There were no accepted criteria of fascism, nor did it possess conventional tenets. Yet one significant feature of all its organized forms was the abruptness with which they appeared and faded out again, only to burst forth with violence after an indefinite period of latency. All this fits into the picture of a social force that waxed and waned according to the objective situation.
What we termed, for short, “fascist situation” was no other than the typical occasion of easy and complete fascist victories. All at once, the tremendous industrial and political organizations of labor and of other devoted upholders of constitutional freedom would melt away, and minute fascist forces would brush aside what seemed until then the overwhelming strength of democratic governments, parties, trade unions. […]
To imagine that it was the strength of the movement which created situations such as these, and not to see that it was the situation that gave birth in this case to the movement, is to miss the outstanding lesson of the last decades.
Fascism, like socialism, was rooted in a market society that refused to function. (Polanyi, 2001, p. 239)
Habe gerade versucht, bei Karl Polanyi ein Zitat zu finden, das zur aktuellen Situation passt. Anlass: Ein Interview im Deutschlandfunk mit einer „Wirtschaftsweisen“, die zwar von den „Gebeutelten“ der Globalisierung spricht, aber die historische Situation nicht benennt und die Parallelen zur Situation vor 100 Jahren absichtlich oder unabsichtlich ignoriert (Malmendier, 2025).
Continue reading